On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 16:39:46 -0500, Khedr, Waleed <Waleed.Khedr@(protected)> wrote: > Read only has to do with dml, has nothing to do with ddl. > > Waleed
That is true, and was rather the point of my demo. I agree that its counter-intuitive. read-only files can't be removed from the filesystem without a warning, it isn't unreasonable to expect similar behaviour for database objects. Wrong, but not unreasonable.